In Miami right now, about to leave for a weeklong cruise w/ my brother and 4 friends. Gonna be pretty sweet....also,gonna be pretty weird to go for like a week with no internet and no poker (probably a good thing for my game).
Brought a couple of books--"What the What" by Dave Eggers and "Middlesex" by Jeffrey Eugenides (hopefully I'm remotely close on that spelling). Started Middlesex yesterday on the plane down, and it's really, really good so far. It's been far too long since I've read a good book.
That's about it. Bye, internet!
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Friday, January 25, 2008
Video Killed the Radio Star
Two videos:
First is a Harvard Law professor being interviewed on the Colbert Report about online poker. He is a great, great spokesperson for the game. I want to give him a big hug. Also, his suggestion at the end about the presidential candidates is possibly the greatest idea I've ever heard.
Second is just one I saw on another person's blog and thought worthy of stealing. I don't watch American Idol, but this guy is awesome.
First is a Harvard Law professor being interviewed on the Colbert Report about online poker. He is a great, great spokesperson for the game. I want to give him a big hug. Also, his suggestion at the end about the presidential candidates is possibly the greatest idea I've ever heard.
Second is just one I saw on another person's blog and thought worthy of stealing. I don't watch American Idol, but this guy is awesome.
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Perspective
Interesting "poker" experience tonight -- came home from work, had dinner, didn't really feel like playing at all 'cause I'm kinda under the weather. Started reading 2p2 and came across some thread about this documentary called "Poker Bustouts." Seemed like everyone found it to be pretty hilarious, so I had to take a look, and OMG is it a classic. This is a documentary about poker "pros" in the classic sense of the word. Hilarious is an understatement. So many quotable lines, I wouldn't even know where to begin. My favorite was the old guy who wore a white fur coat and called himself the "best 3/6 limit player in the world."
After that, I was reading a bit more on 2p2, came across someone rambling about starting some blog to expose the "truth" about online poker--so of course I had to check it out. Dude writes like a mix between Jack Kerouac and Hunter S. Thompson's (OK, I've actually never read anything by Hunter S. Thompson, but I imagine it has to be just like this). A quote from just the beginning of his second blog entry,
So, this all got me thinking about how stupid the average person is and oh god we have a general election in 10 months to determine the next leader of the free world. Some days democracy seems like a worse idea than others (I can hear my brother in my head, "We don't have a democracy; we have a republic," but whatever--you get the point).
Anyway Pandora is playing some awesome country song right now (apparently it's Old Shoes by Tom Waits, never heard it before), so all is good here. This weekend is going to be very cold; I am hoping to stay inside and get a ton of hands in. Weekend poker is almost as good as holiday poker. I think the point of this post overall is that I have keep in mind that 90% of my opponents at the poker table are certain idiots or not far from it, and when I try to out-think them when they're not thinking of much at all, I just end up owning myself.
After that, I was reading a bit more on 2p2, came across someone rambling about starting some blog to expose the "truth" about online poker--so of course I had to check it out. Dude writes like a mix between Jack Kerouac and Hunter S. Thompson's (OK, I've actually never read anything by Hunter S. Thompson, but I imagine it has to be just like this). A quote from just the beginning of his second blog entry,
Ok since I am fucking around in micro stakes online which is the most I will do, I thought I would put some thoughts down. Now when people talk to me about online poker I get many angles on this and I really hear some thoughtful and some down right stupid shit with respect to online poker from both sides. I sit at a table and talk to many live players and they are all convinced that online is a waste of time and rigged, fair enough because they are sitting there playing live. Then I hear from people playing online that it is rigged, ok fuckers if it is rigged and you hate it why are you knowingly risking your money and then bitching about it??? I mean online to me is like a carnival game and that is it, I don’t take them seriously and I don’t take online poker seriously. Sure I see some lucky ass who is walking around with the giant stuffed animal, so some guy won that is just awesome so does that mean I will win, odds are not good. Not to mention let’s look a little deeper into this, maybe he won shit and is hired to walk around with this stupid fucking stuffed animal and a girl? I mean good marketing you are really showing that you can win, and then getting your girl to say I want one of those carny humped bacteria filled stuffed animals, and like a douche bag there you are trying to win a prize. Well then the marketing worked, and yes you too can be a winner, and let’s face it every online tournament has a winner, so why not you? You can be the next Moneymaker, take a semi retarded online donk (99% of the online players) and make him the WSOP champion, now all the other players who suck dick at poker and rely on luck to save them from themselves believe they can be WSOP champ.The blog is called Shoveit.com if anyone cares for a laugh (or a glimpse into the world of the mentally deranged).
So, this all got me thinking about how stupid the average person is and oh god we have a general election in 10 months to determine the next leader of the free world. Some days democracy seems like a worse idea than others (I can hear my brother in my head, "We don't have a democracy; we have a republic," but whatever--you get the point).
Anyway Pandora is playing some awesome country song right now (apparently it's Old Shoes by Tom Waits, never heard it before), so all is good here. This weekend is going to be very cold; I am hoping to stay inside and get a ton of hands in. Weekend poker is almost as good as holiday poker. I think the point of this post overall is that I have keep in mind that 90% of my opponents at the poker table are certain idiots or not far from it, and when I try to out-think them when they're not thinking of much at all, I just end up owning myself.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Results Oriented
Put in a couple hours at Pokerstars tonight; lost like 3 buyins b/c that's how I roll these days but feel like I played very well overall. Ran my overpairs into sets twice [neither were places I could even consider folding--one was a reraised pot and the other a super-drawy flop against a guy with a postflop AF of like 12(!)]. Got sucked out on in one big pot with bottom set against a flush draw.
I'm planning to play a lot more at Pokerstars this year. I figure I can put in enough hands to make their points system be worth more than rakeback at Full Tilt. Also, there's something kind of alluring to me about chasing supernova--I can be less results oriented in the short term and just focus my obsession of "keeping score" on seeing how many player points I can accumulate. Pokerstars really has a fantastic rewards program for heavy multi-tablers--I think someone calculated that achieving "Supernova Elite" is worth over $100K in and of itself (in terms of the different bonuses you get as you accumulate points). It won't be possible for me to get Elite w/ a full-time day job, but if I don't get to supernova by the end of the year, I'll be highly disappointed. Only two problems stand in my way right now--one, I am not nearly as used to Stars' software as I am to FTP, so it's gonna take me a while to work up to 12 tables. I only played six tonight and probably shouldn't go above 8 for the time being. Second problem is simply that the full-ring tables are infested with multitabling 2p2ers; I feel like NL200 at Stars plays like NL400 at Full Tilt. And it's weird not having any read on the regulars yet -- I feel like I can't take any nonstandard lines b/c I don't know how anyone will react to them. (Maybe this is a good thing, heh.)
OK, my third problem is that if I don't stop running bad soon I'm gonna bust my Stars account. I've never busted an account in my life, and I don't really want to start now!...I'm not actually in much danger of losing my Stars roll, but it would be kind of demoralizing to have to move down to NL100. This month so far has been demoralizing enough. I'm getting seriously worried that this is going to be my first losing month ever, which would be pretty funny* considering December was my best month ever. *Unfortunately, I don't mean funny as in Woody Allen-movie funny, but more like "please just shoot me now" funny.
Here is the best example of why poker is a cruel, cruel game and how it can toy with you. First graph is the first 15 days of December (hottest I've ever run); second is the first 15 days of January (not the worst I've ever run, but painful nonetheless).
December:
January:
The one good thing about downswings is they really motivate me to work on my game. I hate losing. Gonna go watch a video and try to plug a leak or two.
I'm planning to play a lot more at Pokerstars this year. I figure I can put in enough hands to make their points system be worth more than rakeback at Full Tilt. Also, there's something kind of alluring to me about chasing supernova--I can be less results oriented in the short term and just focus my obsession of "keeping score" on seeing how many player points I can accumulate. Pokerstars really has a fantastic rewards program for heavy multi-tablers--I think someone calculated that achieving "Supernova Elite" is worth over $100K in and of itself (in terms of the different bonuses you get as you accumulate points). It won't be possible for me to get Elite w/ a full-time day job, but if I don't get to supernova by the end of the year, I'll be highly disappointed. Only two problems stand in my way right now--one, I am not nearly as used to Stars' software as I am to FTP, so it's gonna take me a while to work up to 12 tables. I only played six tonight and probably shouldn't go above 8 for the time being. Second problem is simply that the full-ring tables are infested with multitabling 2p2ers; I feel like NL200 at Stars plays like NL400 at Full Tilt. And it's weird not having any read on the regulars yet -- I feel like I can't take any nonstandard lines b/c I don't know how anyone will react to them. (Maybe this is a good thing, heh.)
OK, my third problem is that if I don't stop running bad soon I'm gonna bust my Stars account. I've never busted an account in my life, and I don't really want to start now!...I'm not actually in much danger of losing my Stars roll, but it would be kind of demoralizing to have to move down to NL100. This month so far has been demoralizing enough. I'm getting seriously worried that this is going to be my first losing month ever, which would be pretty funny* considering December was my best month ever. *Unfortunately, I don't mean funny as in Woody Allen-movie funny, but more like "please just shoot me now" funny.
Here is the best example of why poker is a cruel, cruel game and how it can toy with you. First graph is the first 15 days of December (hottest I've ever run); second is the first 15 days of January (not the worst I've ever run, but painful nonetheless).
December:
January:
The one good thing about downswings is they really motivate me to work on my game. I hate losing. Gonna go watch a video and try to plug a leak or two.
Monday, January 14, 2008
More on Downswings
Meant to post this before. This is something Jman on 2p2 posted in his "in the well" thread, which is the best thread I've read in a loooong, looong time. The part about going on autopilot when running bad really hit home for me -- I never realized how true that is of myself until I read it. Anyway, quote:
people play worse and less decisively when stuck. They don't trust their decisions as much. The opposite is true for players who are running better.
Also when players are losing, they often go on autopilot and hope to run good. Players who are winning think about every hand and look for any +EV spot. This might have the effect of the losing player not fighting for the small pots.
Someone losing is often scared to make correct plays because they feel their opponent is inside their head. They can envision their (good) river bluff getting snapcalled with bottom pair, so they opt not to make it. Things like that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
